LANSING – The signed framework for

the 2015-16 fiscal year will leave an unusually large number of major items for

Michigan House-Senate conference committees to resolve, but points toward

reductions at the Department of Talent and Economic Development as well as the

human services portion of the Department of Health and Human Services.

It is the thinnest target agreement

in memory in the sense that Governor Rick Snyder and Republican legislative

leaders resolved far fewer top issues than usual. And, in a departure from a

years-long tradition, officials refused to make public the target agreement,

although Gongwer News Service obtained a copy.

As Gongwer News Service first

reported, the budget will contain a $400 million General Fund commitment to

roads. And it will increase funding for university operations by 1.5 percent

with universities limited to increasing tuition by no more than 2.8 percent to

receive that additional funding.

The film incentive, funded in recent

years at $50 million (and $38 million for the current year), would fall to $25

million. Snyder had proposed $50 million, while the House had proposed

eliminating the program entirely.

A dispute over $5.8 million in

revenue sharing funds would be resolved by ensuring no funding cut to any

municipality, although details were still sketchy.

Both the House and Senate passed

substantial cuts to the Michigan Economic Development Corporation’s business

attraction programs, and based on the target agreement containing $25.4 million

less for the Department of Talent and Economic Development than what Snyder

proposed, it appears a substantial cut is coming there.

The target agreement sets General

Fund spending for human services at $942.2 million – about $20 million less

than what Snyder recommended, $31 million less than what the Senate passed and

$26 million less than what the House passed. Sources indicated this smaller

number was not a reflection of caseloads, but would result in less spending on

programs than might have been expected. The question of whether the Maxey

Training School will remain open has yet to be resolved.

The agreement also backs Snyder’s

request to deposit $95 million into the Budget Stabilization Fund.

Several other key items, like per

pupil spending in K-12 schools and the formula through which those funds would

be allocated, remained unclear Wednesday evening. The fate of the $100 million

in additional money for at-risk students and $75 million for distressed school

districts that Snyder proposed – and the Republican-led Legislature clearly

disdained – also was unclear.

Another major question is what will

happen to Graduate Medical Education. Snyder proposed ending General Fund

support for the program and instead having hospitals put up the funding (which

they would recoup through federal matching funds). The House supported that

proposal while the Senate did not.

Snyder, Senate Majority Leader Arlan Meekhof (R-West Olive) and

House Speaker Kevin Cotter (R-Mount Pleasant) all said

in a statement that education would receive additional funding although it was

unclear Wednesday how much or through what mechanisms.

“By increasing our investment

in our infrastructure and education, we’re investing in Michigan’s

future,” Snyder said. “This is essential work to keep our economy

growing stronger and improving the quality of life for all Michiganders. I am

pleased with how quickly the process has moved along, and I think this is a

testament to the strong working relationship we have with our legislative

partners.”

On roads, a joint statement from the

three men said they would work through the summer for a long-term solution. The

$400 million for roads from the General Fund is up from the $139.5 million that

Snyder recommended and the House and Senate passed, an amount necessary to

ensure the state got its full federal match. The state put $284.7 million from

the General Fund into roads for the current 2014-15 fiscal year.

Meekhof said the budget prioritizes

roads, education, public safety and the most vulnerable.

“As a result, some areas of the

budget will see increases, while others will experience a reduction in

funding,” he said.

This story was published by Gongwer News Service. To subscribe, click on www.gongwer.com