LANSING – As

the Michigan Senate Energy and Technology Committee wrapped public testimony on

part of its energy policy package, renewable power companies and environmental

groups urged that the panel retain the state’s current net metering program.

Under the

bill (SB

438), those producing their own power

but still connected to the utility would essentially be charged for all the

power they use but be credited the wholesale value of any power they generate.

Supporters

of the current system said the change would potentially eliminate the market

for solar power in the state, but utilities said the change was needed to

ensure they can cover the costs of their infrastructure.

Mike Linsea,

owner of Solar Winds Power Systems, said his business stagnated over the past

year as the future of the net metering system came into question. “If we

can’t get past the math, solar isn’t going to work,” he said.

If the

system does change, Linsea said those producing their own power should see

prices reflect that they produce during peak times.

Jim Hall

with the Michigan Electric and Gas Association said the current net metering

program works as long as the number of customers using the service remains as

it is. “Those customers continue to not pay their share of the

distribution costs,” he said, but they are few enough to not raise revenue

concerns for his member utilities.

“Our

concern is with the growth more than the current level of net metering,”

he said, adding some states are seeing that growth.

“In the

long run, it’s going to be better to get the pricing signals right even for the

solar suppliers,” Hall said. “They should want to support the grid

because they need it.”

Colgrove

said the net metering system has to accommodate those who are intentionally not

generating more than they need.

Shaun Taft,

chair of the Coalition to Keep Michigan Warm, urged that low-income residents

be considered in discussing the bill. She did not state a position for her

organization, but said she personally opposes the bill because low-income

residents would not be able to participate in the net metering program and so

would end up subsidizing it.

“When

you think of the things that folks can do that are a little more affluent …

most folks that we serve would never be able to purchase that equipment,”

she said.

Loss of the

efficiency standards will mean loss of those programs, advocates said.

Jim Weeks,

executive director of the Michigan Municipal Electric Association, said

eliminating the renewable and efficiency standards would not mean backsliding

on those issues.

“While

municipals are strong supporters of renewable energy and energy efficiency, we

would like to be able to do so without rigid state mandates,” he said.

Sen.

Mike Nofs(R-Battle Creek), chair of the committee, said the panel

would have one more discussion on the bill next week with Michigan Agency for

Energy Executive Director Valerie Brader. Discussions onSB

437 *will resume the following week.

This story

was published by Gongwer News Service. To subscribe, click on www.gongwer.com