LANSING – With the U.S. Supreme

Court holding that state commissions, created by voter initiatives, can

constitutionally draw the district lines for Congressional members, the

question now comes down to whether such an effort will be attempted in

Michigan.

There has been, especially since the

2012 redistricting plan was adopted, much discussion among Democrats and others

on creating a citizen commission to oversee redistricting both for Congress and

the Legislature. But so far no one has stepped forward to announce they would

undertake an effort.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in

a case involving the Arizona redistricting commission that it could draw lines

for members of Congress and that the U.S. Constitution did not leave that

authority exclusively to the Legislature, Arizona

State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (SCOTUS docket No. 13-1314).

There was never a question that a

commission could direct how the state’s legislative districts were drawn, but

following the 2012 Congressional district plan, the Arizona legislature argued

the U.S. Constitution gave authority for drafting the lines for Congress only

to it.

In an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader

Ginsburg, joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, Justice Stephen Breyer, Justice

Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan, the court held that both the U.S.

Constitution and U.S. election law allowed for the commission.

Quoting John Locke, James Madison

and Alexander Hamilton, along with previous decisions of the Supreme Court, Ms.

Ginsburg said the states can view the Legislature as including all of the

public. While direct citizen participation in lawmaking was little known when

the Constitution was drafted – though such things as New England town councils

had existed at the time – the ability of direct citizen involvement in state

legislative action had become a significant part of legislative governance in

many states, she said.

And if the court held the citizens

in Arizona could not participate in drawing Congressional lines through the

commission created in 2000 to help combat gerrymandering, then a number of

other laws that affect elections, and that were adopted by initiatives, would

be in question, Ms. Ginsburg said.

The decision upheld the finding of

three-judge district court on the issue.

But dissenting, Chief Justice John

Roberts, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice

Samuel Alito, argued that the Constitution has many references to legislature

and they mostly refer to just the individual legislature.

The majority in the case, Mr.

Roberts said, has by a “magic trick” interpreted the legislature to

mean the people.

A spokesperson for the Michigan

Republican Party could not be reached for comment.

But Michigan Democratic Party Chair

Lon Johnson – who is chair until July 11 as he prepares to run for Congress in

the 1st District – said the decision of the court “sends a clear message

that gerrymandering to suppress voting is no longer a viable political

strategy.”

He charged the Republican policies

have alienated voters and that in each election more people vote Democratic.

“Republicans see the numbers. They know the only way to maintain a

majority in Michigan is by drawing unapologetic lines that blatantly stack the

deck in their favor,” Mr. Johnson said.

Now the voters can explore the

option of a “fairer system” that better reflects voter sentiments, he

said.

Rep.

Sam Singh (D-East Lansing) said he hoped the Michigan voters would go

towards developing an “independent redistricting commission in the near

future.”

But will the voters take up that

task?

Several people interviewed said

there has been much talk in recent years about such a commission, but it was

unclear who might start a process.

Sue Smith with the Michigan League

of Women Voters said while her organization is “thrilled with the

decision,” there was no effort underway yet on the question.

But the league is beginning to

prepare an educational program on the question of redistricting, she said. Such

a program would look at state legislative as well as congressional

redistricting, she said.

This story was published by Gongwer News Service. To

subscribe, click on www.gongwer.com